Accurate, Focused Research on Law, Technology and Knowledge Discovery Since 2002

EPA OIG Reports: National Emergency Response Planning, Chesapeake Bay Watershed Oversight

  • 08-P-0055 EPA Should Continue to Improve Its National Emergency Response Planning [Report PDF – 27 pages] [At a Glance PDF] January 9, 2008: “We found that EPA’s Emergency Response Business Plan did not disclose the basis for EPA’s resource estimates. Additionally, EPA management stated they did not consider State and local resources in their resource estimates because they believed they would be working with the affected State and local governments in a unified command structure. EPA considered past experience in estimating the activities they would be asked to perform. Also, EPA did not use existing data on chlorine storage volumes because it was attempting to develop a national scenario applicable to any chemical.”
  • 08-P-0049 Despite Progress, EPA Needs to Improve Oversight of Wastewater Upgrades in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed [Report PDF – 39 pages] [At a Glance PDF] January 8, 2008
  • : “Chesapeake Bay wastewater treatment facilities risk not meeting the 2010 deadline for nutrient reductions if key facilities are not upgraded in time. In the 7 years since signing the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, EPA and its State partners have taken a number of steps to lay the foundation for achieving the 2010 wastewater nutrient reduction goals. Water quality standards have been set, nutrient loadings have been allocated, and nutrient limits are beginning to be incorporated into permits. However, States need to finish adding nutrient limits to the permits, and the facilities will need to make significant reductions in the 3 years remaining before the deadline. Crucially, these reductions will need to be maintained once achieved.

    Sorry, comments are closed for this post.