| U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit | Cases filed prior to January 1, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit | Cases filed prior to CM/ECF conversion |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit | Cases filed prior to January 1, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Cases filed prior to March 1, 2012 |
| U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California | Cases filed prior to May 1, 2001 |
- See also – Why the federal court record system PACER is so broken, and how to fix it and via the Washington Post –
“Charles Hall, a spokesperson for the Administrative Office, told The Post via e-mail that the change was made on Aug. 11 in preparation for an overhaul of the the PACER architecture, including the implementation of the next generation of the Judiciary’s Case Management and Electronic Case Files System. “NextGen replaces the older CM/ECF system and provides improvements for users, including a single sign-on for PACER and NextGen,” he wrote. However, as a result of the changes the locally developed legacy case management systems of some courts were no longer compatible with PACER, he says. Since PACER works as a sort of distributed network of different archives rather than one centralized database, that’s a major problem. However, Hall says, the dockets and documents no longer available through the system could still be obtained directly from the relevant court and “all open cases, as well as any new filings, will continue to be available on PACER.”
- The Administrative Office of the United States Courts – Director’s letter to Senate Patrick J. Leahy, September 19, 2014 and Sen. Leahy’s letter to the AO Director.
