Wendy Liu – The Guardian – As intelligence itself becomes privatised by big tech, allowing your intellectual faculties to wither in service of inane bots seems a dangerous move. Long before the age of multi-billion-dollar AI companies promising to disrupt the field of software development, I was learning to code the hard way. It was the mid-2000s, and I was a child with unmonitored access to the family computer. With the help of a basic text editor program, I learned how to make websites – first basic, then increasingly complex – from scratch. The results were never as beautiful or polished as in my imagination, but I could live with that, because I was learning a craft. The painstaking hours of debugging and poring over arcane documentation for projects that I eventually abandoned never felt wasted. This all sounds so quaint now, in an era when anyone can spin up a slick-looking app using OpenAI’s Codex or Anthropic’s Claude Code, and high-school dropouts are raising millions for their AI startups. To be clear, my educational journey was not particularly efficient; I toiled away solo, following my own shoddy, made-up syllabus, motivated by curiosity and a desire to understand. Still, in the process, I discovered a love for a certain way of thinking, one that would carry me through a four-year computer science degree plus various software development jobs. I could tell a similar story about becoming a writer. My initial desire to write about the tech industry came out of a sense of frustration with what I was reading. I felt like there was something missing in the discourse, some gap between my own increasingly critical understanding of Silicon Valley and the optimistic and credulous way it was discussed by other people. Since then, I’ve published many thousands of words, with countless more left on the cutting-room floor. But even the discarded words never felt wasted, because they were the byproduct of thinking. Any writer can attest to the transformational nature of the writing process: you can start out with one idea, only to end up somewhere quite different. Writing is more than a matter of merely outputting words. It’s a matter of discovering what your values are and convincing yourself that they’re worth fighting for…”

• See also Hating AI is good, actually. LinkedIn may be awash with boosters, but shunning AI is the human choice.
• See also Everyone’s a thought leader. Almost no one is thinking. LinkedIn has never been a great social network, but in the not-so-distant past, there was a time where people put effort into curating their personal image and brand. Sometimes there would even be some sort of meaningful exchange between individuals. That ship has long sailed. LinkedIn is still useful for finding a job, but the social aspect is an unusable cesspool of AI slop, and has been for quite a while.